All original content is created in Ukrainian. Not all content has been translated yet. Some posts may only be available in Ukrainian.Learn more

From "pure race" to ethical dilemmas or what is eugenics?

Post cover: From "pure race" to ethical dilemmas or what is eugenics?
This content has been automatically translated from Ukrainian.

What is eugenics?

Eugenics (from the Greek “eugenes” — “well-born”, “noble”) — is a scientifically unfounded and deeply immoral theory that emerged in the late 19th century. Its proponents believed that humanity could be “improved” through so-called “selective breeding,” allegedly accumulating desirable traits and eliminating undesirable ones. These ideas were based on a distorted understanding of genetics, claiming that complex human qualities such as intelligence, behavior, or susceptibility to diseases are passed down simply through heredity.
Historically, eugenics had two main branches:
  • Positive eugenics
aimed at encouraging the reproduction of people with desirable, “valuable” traits for society (high intelligence, physical and mental health).
  • Negative eugenics
focused on preventing the reproduction of people with undesirable or “harmful” traits, such as hereditary diseases, mental disorders, intellectual disabilities, physical defects, and addictions.

Origins and Global Spread

The term “eugenics” was introduced in 1883 by English statistician Francis Galton (a cousin of Charles Darwin). He defined it as “the study of factors under social control that can improve or impair the racial qualities of future generations.” Galton's ideas about the heredity of health, disease, and intelligence formed the basis of eugenic thought.
By the 1920s, eugenics had become a global movement, supported by governments, elites, and the general public in countries such as Germany, the USA, the UK, Italy, Canada, and Mexico. It was actively promoted by statisticians, economists, anthropologists, sociologists, geneticists, and other specialists through scientific and popular literature.
europeana-bjSlmTB09VM-unsplash.jpg

Nazi Germany: The Apex of Eugenics Abuse

The most tragic application of eugenics occurred in Nazi Germany (1933–1945). The Nazi regime used eugenic ideas to “purify” the German people of those they deemed “unworthy of life.” This led to horrific consequences: mass murders under the “euthanasia” program, which claimed the lives of at least 70,000 adults and 5,200 children; forced sterilizations affecting at least 400,000 people; as well as the near-total destruction of the Jewish people during the Holocaust and attempts to eliminate other marginalized groups, such as Sinti and Roma, people with disabilities, and LGBTQ+ individuals.

Eugenics Today

Eugenics was completely discredited after World War II, but its practices and ideas unfortunately still manifest in various forms. In many countries, forced sterilization and institutionalization continued at least until the 1970s, and in some cases, their echoes can still be seen today.
Modern advances in genomic technologies raise new ethical dilemmas. The development of genomic screening and polygenic risk scores creates dangerous societal pressure regarding pregnancy termination if risks of genetic disorders, such as Down syndrome, are detected. However, it is important to distinguish between historical, coercive eugenics and modern medicine. Breakthroughs in genomic technologies allow for the detection of serious risks of genetic disorders in the fetus. In such cases, the decision to terminate a pregnancy is not eugenics but an informed choice by the parents. It is a deeply personal decision based on medical data, family circumstances, and humanitarian principles, rather than a desire to “improve the race” or state coercion.
The possibility of screening embryos for behavioral or intellectual traits during in vitro fertilization (IVF) and preimplantation genetic diagnosis currently raises discussions, as the line between preventing suffering and potential discrimination becomes thinner. We must ensure that medical advancements serve humanity and support the right to choose and a quality life, rather than for coercive “culling” based on any traits.

This post doesn't have any additions from the author yet.

"True Crime": From Origins to Modernity and Its Influence
26 May 17:28

"True Crime": From Origins to Modernity and Its Influence

Kara Winslow
Kara Winslow@winslow-vixen
Grooming: Why it is the key to your pet's health and comfort?
28 May 22:54

Grooming: Why it is the key to your pet's health and comfort?

Kara Winslow
Kara Winslow@winslow-vixen
"Swag" or "to give swag": What it means in the world of modern slang
31 May 11:44

"Swag" or "to give swag": What it means in the world of modern slang

Kara Winslow
Kara Winslow@winslow-vixen
What is freelancing and how to manage your career independently
03 Jun 09:58

What is freelancing and how to manage your career independently

Kara Winslow
Kara Winslow@winslow-vixen
Person and space: What is proxemics?
06 Jun 18:59

Person and space: What is proxemics?

Kara Winslow
Kara Winslow@winslow-vixen
"Default": How a Technical Term Became Part of Youth Slang
06 Jun 23:18

"Default": How a Technical Term Became Part of Youth Slang

Kara Winslow
Kara Winslow@winslow-vixen
"MILF": Sexual revolution or another form of objectification?
07 Jun 21:45

"MILF": Sexual revolution or another form of objectification?

Kara Winslow
Kara Winslow@winslow-vixen
Office vs Remote Work: The Choice of the Young Generation in Times of Change and Challenges
09 Jun 16:17

Office vs Remote Work: The Choice of the Young Generation in Times of Change and Challenges

Kara Winslow
Kara Winslow@winslow-vixen
Mentorship: Navigating to Success and Personal Growth
10 Jun 16:06

Mentorship: Navigating to Success and Personal Growth

Kara Winslow
Kara Winslow@winslow-vixen
"Proof": From Code to Slang
10 Jun 17:27

"Proof": From Code to Slang

Kara Winslow
Kara Winslow@winslow-vixen